Short answer: Spend thirty minutes running test prompts on the five main AI platforms and measure four signals: whether the AI names your business, which source it cites, whether its facts are accurate (hours, services, area, phone), and your share of voice versus competitors. Log the results and triage — this is a one-time diagnostic audit, not a tracking system.
You check your Google rankings. You check your reviews. But when a homeowner asks ChatGPT for an emergency plumber, do you know what it says? Most trades businesses have never checked, and the answer is often uncomfortable: the AI names your competitors, describes your business wrong, or has never heard of you at all.
This is the one-time diagnostic audit. It is not a tracking system and not a tactics playbook, it is thirty minutes of honest measurement that tells you exactly where you stand. Run the prompts, log the results, triage what you find. When you are done, our ChatGPT recommendation guide covers the fixes, and our AI search mechanism explainer covers why the answers look the way they do.
AI visibility is not one thing. HubSpot's answer engine visibility playbook breaks it into four signals, mentions, citations, sentiment, and share of voice, and for this audit you are measuring all four in their simplest form:
You are not checking rankings. AI answers do not have positions the way search results do. You are checking presence, correctness, and position in the shortlist, across platforms, because each platform can give you a different answer.
Generic advice says to ask "questions your customers ask." That is not specific enough to be useful. Homeowner queries for trades fall into four types, and you need prompts from all four, because your visibility can differ by type. Adapt these to your trade and city, and use your actual city name, not "near me," so results are comparable month to month:
Eight prompts is enough for a first audit. The temptation is to ask twenty; the value is in running the same eight every month and watching the pattern move. Write them down exactly as you ask them, because rewording between audits makes the results incomparable.
Run all eight prompts on five platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. This takes about thirty minutes if you stay disciplined: ask, screenshot or copy the answer, log it, move on. Do not argue with the AI mid-audit. You are measuring, not optimizing, today.
Expect the platforms to disagree. Google's surfaces lean on your business profile data, so a complete profile usually shows up there first. ChatGPT and Perplexity lean harder on third-party content and live retrieval, so your review presence and directory footprint matter more to them. A business can be present on AI Overviews and absent from ChatGPT, and that split is itself a finding: it tells you which side of your footprint is thin.
Eight prompts across five platforms, logged once: thirty minutes for a complete picture of whether AI search engines mention your business. Monthly after that, half the time.
A spreadsheet with one row per prompt per platform. These are the columns that matter:
After forty rows, the pattern will be obvious. The three findings that matter: where you are absent entirely, where you are misdescribed, and which competitor keeps taking your slot. Those three findings drive the triage below.
Not all gaps are equal. Fix in this order, because each layer gates the next:
Notice what is not on the list: obsessing over wording, or asking the AI again hoping for a better answer. AI answers reflect your evidence footprint. Change the evidence, and the answers follow.
One more check while you are in audit mode: AI-driven visits are probably already reaching your site, disguised. AI assistants often send traffic without a proper referrer, so it lands in your analytics as Direct or Unassigned instead of a named source. Google's own AI features documentation explains how AI-feature traffic is counted in Search Console, which gives you one measurement anchor.
In your analytics, look for the tells: a slow rise in Direct traffic to pages that rank for question-style queries, Unassigned sessions with unusually high engagement, or brand searches growing faster than your ad spend would explain. None of this is precise, but it tells you whether AI-driven discovery is already a real channel for you, or whether you are building it from zero.
The audit above is a one-time diagnostic. Its real value compounds when you repeat it. Save your eight prompts exactly as written, keep the log sheet, and re-run monthly. You are watching for three movements: your name appearing where it was absent, wrong facts getting corrected as source fixes propagate, and your shortlist position improving.
Monthly is the right cadence. Weekly adds noise, because reviews and listings move slowly and models shift gradually; quarterly is too slow to catch a new competitor moving into your slots. After each run, update only the triage items that changed. The month your brand prompts come back clean and your emergency prompts name you is the month the foundation work is done.
Ask it the way a homeowner would: recommend a plumber in my city, and a brand query with your business name. Log whether you are named, cited, or absent, and what it says about you. Run the same prompts on Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, since each platform uses different sources and your visibility can differ wildly between them.
Run the full audit monthly, because AI answers change as the underlying sources update and models shift. Weekly checking adds noise without insight, since reviews and listings move slowly. Re-run immediately after you change something material: a profile overhaul, a new batch of reviews, or a website rebuild.
It means the assistant trusts your business as a recommendation but trusts a third party as the source: a review site, a directory, or a news article that corroborates you. This is normal and common; AI systems cite independent sources far more than business websites. Strengthen your third-party presence, especially review platforms, rather than chasing citations to your own site.
Wrong AI-stated facts almost always come from wrong source data: an outdated directory listing, an old address on a review site, or inconsistent hours. Ask where it got the fact, trace it to the source page, and fix it there. Correcting the source is the only durable fix; the AI will pick up the correction on its next pass.
Five: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. ChatGPT and Perplexity lean on third-party content and live retrieval; Google's surfaces lean on your business profile data. Checking all five takes about thirty minutes and shows you exactly where you are strong, weak, or entirely absent.
Profile, Maps rankings, citations, reviews, plus the full AI visibility test across every platform. A prioritized fix list, free, no pitch.
Delivered within 48 hours. Yours to keep.